Evidence atlas · Topic

Costs and returnwhat the research examines

Short answer: The library holds 8 references on virtual reality and costs and return, published between 2018 and 2025. They include 1 systematic review or meta-analysis. The research mainly examines economic evaluations of virtual reality for postoperative pain and on the ward.

The evidence in numbers

8References
1Systematic reviews and meta-analyses
0Randomised trials
2018–2025Years
  • Meta-analyses1
  • Economic evaluations7

Counted in the RVer study library · languages: English. The design of each study was classified by the team from the publication.

What the research examines

  • Economic evaluations of virtual reality for postoperative pain and on the ward.
  • Preparing children for examinations without sedation.
  • Psychological therapies in virtual reality, including automated ones.
  • Training professionals in virtual reality.

What is not yet known

  • Almost no evaluations carried out in Portugal or southern Europe.
  • Implementation costs and staff time.
  • The perspective of social care institutions (care homes, day centres).

The references, by study design

Glossary terms

Other topics

This page describes what published research on virtual reality examines in this topic. It is not a claim about RVer's performance and does not replace clinical assessment. The Class I medical device registration (EUDAMED, Basic UDI-DI 56006195127RVERTZ, and INFARMED, Portugal, CDM 94571546) covers the RVer base product.