RVer Articles · Knowledge

Articles / Contextos clínicos

A care home activity plan: where virtual reality fits (and where it does not)

It is not a group activity, it does not replace company and it does not save you the coordinator. That said, it fits exactly the gaps a group plan never covers.

Topic
Contextos clínicos
Read
7 min read
Published
16 August 2026
Author
RVer
Scope
Base product · Class I

A care home's activity plan is built out of constraints: one activities coordinator for sixty residents, a room that is also the dining room, rainy days when nobody goes out, and a third of the residents who join nothing in a group.

This is a practical note on where virtual reality fits into that plan — and, just as plainly, where it does not.

Where it does not fit

Worth starting here, because it is what prevents buying badly.

  • It is not a group activity. One person at a time, with someone alongside. If the problem is filling Wednesday afternoon for twenty people, this does not solve it.
  • It does not replace company. Nobody should end up more isolated because of it. It is a short, accompanied session, not a way to park someone alone.
  • It is not continuous entertainment. Long sessions tire people and lose their effect. What we see working is five to fifteen minutes.
  • It does not save you the coordinator. Someone picks the scenario, fits the headset and stays with the person.

Where it does fit

It fits exactly the gaps the group plan does not cover:

People who join nothing. There is always a set of residents who refuse group activities — shyness, hearing loss, dislike of noise. A ten-minute individual session in an armchair is a way in for someone who never appears in the day room.

People who do not leave their room. Bedbound, in isolation, recovering from a fracture. This is the group an activity plan usually loses entirely, and it is where something that travels makes the most difference. There is a lying mode for people who are reclined.

Rainy days and August. The cancelled outing, the week half the team is on holiday. An activity that depends on neither weather nor transport takes pressure off the calendar.

Conversation that starts from a place. Seeing the grape harvest, a familiar beach or a village tends to open conversation better than a direct question. The activity does not end when the headset comes off — often that is when it starts.

Moments with family. A visitor who does not know what to say has a subject: choosing the place, watching the reaction, talking about it afterwards.

A realistic week

Not a plan to copy — the shape that tends to work when it is added to what already exists:

Day Morning Afternoon
Monday group exercise 4 individual sessions (bedrooms)
Tuesday craft workshop outing, or scenarios indoors if it rains
Wednesday music 4 individual sessions (new residents)
Thursday table games family visits — session for two
Friday service / conversation 4 individual sessions (bedbound)

Twelve to sixteen sessions a week, with one person running them. At five minutes to choose and fit, plus ten of session, it fits into an afternoon without undoing the rest.

What to record

Two columns solve almost everything: who and what. Who took part, which scenario, how long, and a line about the reaction. It serves three things a clinical director needs: showing families what was done, learning what works with each person, and answering an audit without reconstructing anyone's memory.

In RVer that record is automatic — what was watched, on which device and for how long. What is not recorded is any clinical data about the resident: that never leaves the headset.

Virtual reality in a care home is a comfort, stimulation and wellbeing activity, run by trained professionals or carers and never self-administered. It is not treatment, it does not replace clinical assessment or prescribed therapy, and the decision to include it in each resident's plan belongs to the team.

Three questions before putting it in the plan

  1. Who will run it? Without a name and a time slot, it does not happen.
  2. Who goes first? Start with the people who join nothing — that is where it shows.
  3. How will you know it worked? If it is not recorded, in three months the answer is an opinion.

RVer is a virtual reality system for clinical use designed for healthcare settings, whose base product is registered as a Class I Medical Device with Infarmed (CDM 94571546) and bears the CE mark under MDR 2017/745. The RVer Motion, RVer Neuro and RVer Exposure modules are in development and are not covered by that registration.

On who can run the sessions, see who can run a session. On bedbound residents, see lying mode.

On the arithmetic that justifies this to management, see what it returns in a care home.

A concrete case?

Tell us what the situation is

We answer yes, «it needs testing», or no — all three happen, and the last one is useful too.

Talk to our team →

← Back to the articles